Author: Fiona McCall

  • “How can you be an artist and not reflect the times?” – studying Nina Simone and her times

    “How can you be an artist and not reflect the times?” – studying Nina Simone and her times

    Below Pauline Standley describes the experience of studying for a master’s degree in history (MRes) at Portsmouth.  She looked at the role of Nina Simone as a civil rights activist, a feminist, and someone who reflected the broader socio-political shifts of her time.  Pauline’s supervisor was Dr Lee Sartain.

    Nina Simone. For many, her name immediately brings to mind her iconic, richly textured voice, often accompanied by signature sounds of the trumpets and piano in timeless classics like “I Put a Spell on You” or “Feeling Good”. While these songs undoubtedly capture her unshakeable legacy, Nina Simone is also a reservoir of intersectional experiences that reveal much about the socio-political dynamics of 20th-century America. In examining the personal evolution of Nina Simone and the broader societal changes, my research brings together cultural, political and intellectual histories, which illustrates how figures like Nina were pivotal in shaping resistance movements for African Americans. Using her a case study in my research project has been incredibly fruitful, allowing me to engage with the themes I’m deeply passionate about – gender and race within the American context – and understanding their impacts on an incredibly personal level. It also highlighted just how overlooked Nina Simone is; though celebrated as a musical icon, her contribution to the civil rights and feminist movements remain significantly understudied. Certainly, this makes for exciting research: digging through archives, furiously highlighting her autobiography, dissecting her thoughts and reflections, and then juxtaposing these findings with the ideas of key intellectuals and leaders of her time to discover how they connected – or contrasted! This is often followed by overly excited, far-too-long email to my supervisor (apologies, Lee) where I gush about my latest discoveries and how incredible she is. The brilliant part of having a supervisor, though, is they usually match your enthusiasm, and suddenly a “look what I found!” turns into a whole chapter of analysis.

    Nina Simone singing in a small group, 1963
    Musical Division, “Singing in a small group with Lorraine Hansberry and Nina Simone” The New York Public Library Collections, 1963. https://digitalcollections.nypl.org/items/5d9a7e60-2cf4-0135-0613-0fc77b59adf9

     

    Though the scope initially felt overwhelming, it proved to be a perfect size – big enough to cover the nuances of the topic, yet focused enough to stop the research from running away with itself. For an entire year, I was immersed in discovering and researching Nina Simone and 20th-century America. Skeletal ideas that I had been tossing around gradually blossomed into well-structured project. There is an unmatched sense of satisfaction in witnessing an academic piece you’ve designed and nurtured evolve into a comprehensive body of work. The MRes course is perfectly tailored for those who like to have creative control and the space to freedom to focus on their own specialist content, which is an added bonus if you are looking to further your academic studies but there are no available MAs which aligns to your topic area. Whilst the main body of the MRes is occupied in undertaking the dissertation, there are other assignments due such as a Literature Review, Research Proposal and Poster Presentation. Each of these assignments are extremely helpful in laying out the bare bones of your project, your key arguments and the existent body of research you will refer to. It will not only help you feel more confident in your project, as it will force you to critically examine your own work, but it will help you develop key skills such as critical thinking, research methodology and effective articulation of complex ideas – all highly attractive skills for employability.

    So, readers of the History Blog Site! Heed my call – don’t overlook the Masters of Research (MRes) Course. If you enjoyed, are currently enjoying or enjoy the idea of undertaking your dissertation, designing and leading a project tailored to themes that fascinate you, and you’re curious about deepening your academic studies, I urge you to consider the MRes. For me, it built on the skills I developed during my undergraduate years and become of the most transformative and rewarding period of my academic journey. And if you’re thinking of pursuing a PhD in the future, the MRes is the perfect stepping stone, helping you develop fundamental individual research skills that will prepare you to undertake rigours of doctoral research, including independent study, critical analysis and project management.

  • Too close for comfort: the relationship between the Church and the military during the Interregnum

    Too close for comfort: the relationship between the Church and the military during the Interregnum

    UoP Senior Lecturer in history Dr Fiona McCall had the following post published today on the website of the Ecclesiastical History Society, in which she discusses the extraordinary role of the military in Interregnum religious life.

     

  • The Society for Nautical Research Winter Lecture Series 2024-5

    The Society for Nautical Research have announced the schedule for their forthcoming winter online lecture series. The series aims to promote research into economic, social, political, military and environmental aspects of nautical history, drawing on British, European and international experience. Our own UoP history lecturers Dr Cathryn Pearce and Dr Matthew Heaslip will be giving lectures in February and March next year!

    Lectures held fortnightly on Wednesday evenings at 6:30PM (UTC) between October 2024 to March 2025. They will be held online (via zoom) and free to members of The Society For Nautical Research.

    To become a member see  https://snr.org.uk/become-a-member/ 

    For queries see the convenor at: daisy.turnbull@myport.ac.uk.

    Lecture Schedule

    9th October 2024 :  Dr Catherine Scheybler (King’s College London), ‘The Spanish Ship of the Line: Its origins and development before 1752’.

    23rd October 2024 : Dr Rodrigo Pacheco-Ruiz (National Museum of the Royal Navy),  ‘Documenting HMS Victory repairs using state-of-the-art archaeological 3D and 4D technologies’.

    6th November 2024 : Dr James Davey (University of Exeter), ‘Tempest; The Royal Navy and the Age of Revolution’.

    20th November 2024 : Prof Evan Wilson (Hattendorf Historical Centre), ‘The Horrible Peace; British Veterans and the End of the Napoleonic Wars’.

    4th December 2024 : Sarah Mott, (Lloyd’s Register Foundation) ‘Rewriting Women into Maritime History; the SHE_SEES exhibition’.

    18th December 2024 : Bill Lindsay (Independent Scholar), ‘William Schaw Lindsay; Victorian Entrepreneur’.

    Christmas Break 

    15th January 2025 : Prof Rodrigo Pérez Fernández (Universidad Politécnica de Madrid), ‘The past, present and future of shipbuilding’

    29th January 2025 : Dr Alan James (King’s College London), (full title to be released at later date) 

    12th February 2025 : Dr Matthew Heaslip (University of Portsmouth), ‘Strategic Leisure: Sun, Sea, Sand, and Spies?’

    26th February 2025 : Dr Michael Roberts (University of Bangor), Archaeological exploration of historical shipwrecks in the Irish Sea. (full title TBC)

    12th March 2025 : Dr Jo Stanley (Independent Scholar), ‘Diversity at Sea: How sharing historical research can make a difference to the present and future of the maritime industry and public understanding’.

    19th March 2025 : Dr Cathryn Pearce (University of Portsmouth), ‘Bandied about for a place of refuge’: Extreme Weather, Coastal Shipping, and the Loss of Lord Nelson, 1840′.

     

  • Discovering a railway-worker ancestor

    Discovering a railway-worker ancestor

    Our own Dr Mike Esbester was featured on BBC 1’s ‘Who Do You Think You Are?’ on 5 September 2024, helping Rose Ayling-Ellis learn more about her ancestor’s railway accident.  The episode is available to watch on BBC iPlayer: https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m0022n0p

  • The different experiences of black and white women within the US feminist movement

    The different experiences of black and white women within the US feminist movement

    Recent UoP history graduate Rebekah Sistig’s dissertation looked at how inherited racism divided members of the second-wave feminist movement in the USA.  She discusses her research below, with some good tips on breaking down the process. Rebekah’s supervisor was Dr Lee Sartain.

    Angela Davis, Betty Friedan, bell hooks and Gloria Steinem – all icons of the second wave feminist movement in the US, all women who dedicated their lives to fight against sexism. But were they truly united in their fight against the patriarchy? Was the supposed ‘sisterhood’ all it was chalked up to be? Judging by their contrasting books, organisations, ideologies, and social groups, I think it may not be. 

    The 1960s and 1970s in the US was a time of immense social change and political movements, all of which interacted and influenced each other. Many of the women who were at the forefront of the feminist movement were also heavily involved in the Civil Rights movement, the New Left movement and many others. The impact of these movements all occurring in the same time period lead to great divides in ideological thought even within the movements themselves. In the feminist movement there was much divide over which tactics were most effective in achieving equality amongst men and women and how best to use the movement’s resources. 

    Poster advertising a debate between Gloria Steinem and Jane Galvin-Lewis
    U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM) 101454320; IHM: C00945

    Through my dissertation, I sought to investigate why and how black and white feminists were divided in their cultures and experiences throughout the second wave movement. I investigated key literature, spanning from Friedan’s mighty The Feminine Mystique to grassroots magazines like Azalea: A Magazine by and for Third World Lesbians, and organisations as large as NOW: the National Organization for Women, founded in 1966, to as small as Bread and Roses, a socialist women’s collective founded in 1969. What I concluded was that the divide between white and black feminists was fuelled by decades of racial discrimination and exacerbated by white feminists’ lack of accountability and acknowledgement of their inherited racism in ideological theory and practice. This led to a necessity for black feminists’ to create their own feminist spaces, cultures, and ideology in order for them to tackle the duel oppression they faced in the US. 

    Members of NOW including Betty Friedan.
    Members of NOW including Betty Friedan (left)

    My decision to research the experiences and cultures of women during the second wave movement came from a specific lecture I had during my second year of learning. In the lecture the different forms of feminist ideology were being described, beginning with liberal feminism and trickling down to black feminism and intersectionality. I found myself asking how this separation in ideology had occurred and how this separation may have represented itself in the lives of black and white feminists of the 1970s. Did it change the clothes they wore? The music they listened to? The books they read? This is where I began my research. I began researching feminist music and fashion of the 1970s which I soon found a challenging endeavour, both because of the growing complexity of some of the reading I was finding and due to the seemingly limited amount of historical analysis of feminist culture – particularly relating to black women. So my comparison began to look rather one sided, with many sources either referring to ‘feminists’ as one unified group or focusing blatantly on white feminist groups. So,  I expanded my topic outward. 

    I went back to my second year lecture reading list, as well as one which my supervisor, Dr Lee Sartain, had provided me with after my dissertation proposal, and spent the start of my third year familiarising myself with the wider movement and the most prominent pieces of analysis on the topic – scholars like bell hooks, Wini Breines and Margaret A. Simons to name a few. While doing this foundational research was where my supervisor was most helpful. When I was unsure or unaware of a particular book, organisation, or individual, my supervisor was extremely helpful in recommending reading and documentaries to familiarise myself with certain aspects of the second wave feminist movement. 

    Writing your dissertation can be an extremely daunting task. From the word count, the structural formalities, referencing, researching and even your acknowledgements, it can be extremely stressful and overwhelming. A helpful tactic for writing your dissertation is to follow your initiative when it comes to your research and to choose a topic which interests you, or at least one you think you would be able to write 10,000 words about. Either way by the end of your writing you might find yourself completely sick of your topic, I know I certainly did at times. 

    What I found most helpful in regulating my own stress and keeping my research and writing somewhat manageable was to break it all down as much as possible. I viewed the dissertation as three 2,500 word essays (each one a chapter) put together, one on the historiography surrounding my topic, and two based off of the most comparable aspects of black and white feminist cultures – literature and organisations. Then I broke each chapter down even further. The historiography chapter I divided into different debates/issues which existed in existing research on the second wave movement. Due to my dissertation being a comparison, I was able to divide my second and third chapters into two sections, one focusing on black feminists and the other on white feminists. Once I had broken down my workload into what seemed more manageable, I did my research in sections as well, focusing on one second of my dissertation at a time, allowing me to relax a little bit more. 

    I’m sure many of my fellow graduates will agree that your final year of study goes much quicker than you would expect! Between your dissertation, assessments, final year dinners, parties, and nights out, to your graduation, your final year is one to remember. Try to stop and smell the roses, look after yourself and your peers, and be proud of all that you have and will accomplish! 

     

  • Researching the role of the Western powers in concealing Japanese War Crimes

    Researching the role of the Western powers in concealing Japanese War Crimes

    Recent UoP history graduate Benjamin Taylor wrote his third-year dissertation on Japanese war crimes, discovering that the US and other Western states played a far larger role in the cover-up than has been previously acknowledged.  Below he writes about the trial and error process of writing his dissertation, and how the guidance of his supervisor, Dr Rudolph Ng, has been vital.

    General Tojo was among seven defendants sentenced to death by hanging at the Tokyo War Crimes trials from 1946-48.
    General Tojo was among 7 defendants sentenced to death by hanging at the Tokyo War Crimes trials from 1946-48.

    My chosen topic for my dissertation was an investigation of the cover-up that has surrounded Japanese war crimes. Specifically, my dissertation sought to answer two questions: has there been a cover-up surrounding Japanese war crimes? And two, if so, which country was most instrumental in creating and perpetuating this cover-up? Throughout my dissertation, I argued that the U.S. played a far larger role in creating and perpetuating the cover-up than most traditional scholars attribute to them. The topic of covering up Japanese war crimes may seem like a strange project to research given the wealth of other options. However, the topic fascinated me. As a historian, I believe one of the most important aspects of history is remembrance and acceptance of our past, whether it is pretty and paints us well or not. When I learned of how much effort had been put into making sure this part of history was forgotten, I viewed it as a personal mission to expose the efforts that have gone into concealing these crimes on the part of not just Japan but the whole world.

    I began my research initially by diving into the resources that surrounded the two most notorious of Japan’s war crimes, the Nanjing massacre and the atrocities of Unit 731. These resources helped me write my dissertation’s first draft, which I sent to my supervisor to get his initial opinions. The email I received back was not exactly thrilling, with my supervisor telling me he was glad that I had sent this to him early as, in its current form, the dissertation would have failed spectacularly. I hope it eases your nerves a little to know when writing your own dissertation that my dissertation, which eventually received a first, was a complete failure on its first draft. However, I decided that I would not let this end here. I rewrote the first part of the dissertation and again sent it to my supervisor. It got much the same result, though he did admit it had improved a little. At this point, I knew something needed to change and met with my supervisor to discuss a better approach to my dissertation. After a quick meeting where I refined the questions my dissertation would ask, I got to work on draft number three.

    In 1949, 12 members of the Japanese Kwantung Army were tried as war criminals in the Russian city of Khabarovsk for manufacturing and using biological weapons and carrying out medical experiments during WWII. They were sentenced to terms in labour camps.
    In 1949, 12 members of the Japanese Kwantung Army were tried as war criminals in the Russian city of Khabarovsk for manufacturing and using biological weapons and carrying out medical experiments during WWII. They were sentenced to terms in labour camps and released in 1956.

    After refining my questions, I then looked further into the topic by researching and gathering sources related to the Tokyo war crimes trials, the Soviet Khabarovsk trials, the Chinese Shenyang trials, and gathering sources on the cover-up efforts of the wider world, including those committed by the Dutch, French, and British. During the writing of draft number three, I found an invaluable set of primary sources in the archives of the Pacific Atrocities Education Charity, which had received their documents from the national archives of the United States. These archives contained many documents relating directly to how and why Japanese war crimes were covered up, and these documents proved invaluable to my research. A few weeks later, I sent the newly written, complete draft to my supervisor, and using his helpful feedback comments, I refined the dissertation even further. I ended up writing two more drafts before sending in my work for its final evaluation.

    Prosecutors of Japanese war criminals at the Special Military Tribunal of the Supreme People's Court held in Shenyang in 1656.
    Prosecutors of Japanese war criminals at the Special Military Tribunal held in Shenyang, China, in 1956.

    My takeaways from this experience are as follows: Number one, and I cannot stress this enough, is to give yourself time. By starting my dissertation relatively early, I had time to fail and refine it without the stress of knowing that my deadline was next week. Number two: don’t expect it to be great on your first try. My first try, as mentioned before, failed spectacularly. It took me five drafts to get my dissertation right, and many people take even more drafts than that. Don’t be afraid to go back to scratch; it is better than trying to make something you know is wrong work. Number three: take some time off. A dissertation can feel overwhelming. I certainly felt that I should be working on it all day every day, but it will not help. Taking some time to yourself does an immense amount of good, and often you’ll find your work is better once you have taken a break. Number four is probably the most important takeaway of all: have fun. Do not research a topic you hate because you think it will get you a good grade. I personally loved researching my dissertation, and while there were parts I did not enjoy, overall, researching and writing about a topic that I was genuinely interested in helped the whole process go a lot smoother. Remember, this is your project at the end of the day. And number 5, if I can do it, so can you? My grades coming into this year were not exactly stellar, and I genuinely thought I did not have any chance of getting a first grade the hard work will pay off.