Tag: women

  • The different experiences of black and white women within the US feminist movement

    The different experiences of black and white women within the US feminist movement

    Recent UoP history graduate Rebekah Sistig’s dissertation looked at how inherited racism divided members of the second-wave feminist movement in the USA.  She discusses her research below, with some good tips on breaking down the process. Rebekah’s supervisor was Dr Lee Sartain.

    Angela Davis, Betty Friedan, bell hooks and Gloria Steinem – all icons of the second wave feminist movement in the US, all women who dedicated their lives to fight against sexism. But were they truly united in their fight against the patriarchy? Was the supposed ‘sisterhood’ all it was chalked up to be? Judging by their contrasting books, organisations, ideologies, and social groups, I think it may not be. 

    The 1960s and 1970s in the US was a time of immense social change and political movements, all of which interacted and influenced each other. Many of the women who were at the forefront of the feminist movement were also heavily involved in the Civil Rights movement, the New Left movement and many others. The impact of these movements all occurring in the same time period lead to great divides in ideological thought even within the movements themselves. In the feminist movement there was much divide over which tactics were most effective in achieving equality amongst men and women and how best to use the movement’s resources. 

    Poster advertising a debate between Gloria Steinem and Jane Galvin-Lewis
    U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM) 101454320; IHM: C00945

    Through my dissertation, I sought to investigate why and how black and white feminists were divided in their cultures and experiences throughout the second wave movement. I investigated key literature, spanning from Friedan’s mighty The Feminine Mystique to grassroots magazines like Azalea: A Magazine by and for Third World Lesbians, and organisations as large as NOW: the National Organization for Women, founded in 1966, to as small as Bread and Roses, a socialist women’s collective founded in 1969. What I concluded was that the divide between white and black feminists was fuelled by decades of racial discrimination and exacerbated by white feminists’ lack of accountability and acknowledgement of their inherited racism in ideological theory and practice. This led to a necessity for black feminists’ to create their own feminist spaces, cultures, and ideology in order for them to tackle the duel oppression they faced in the US. 

    Members of NOW including Betty Friedan.
    Members of NOW including Betty Friedan (left)

    My decision to research the experiences and cultures of women during the second wave movement came from a specific lecture I had during my second year of learning. In the lecture the different forms of feminist ideology were being described, beginning with liberal feminism and trickling down to black feminism and intersectionality. I found myself asking how this separation in ideology had occurred and how this separation may have represented itself in the lives of black and white feminists of the 1970s. Did it change the clothes they wore? The music they listened to? The books they read? This is where I began my research. I began researching feminist music and fashion of the 1970s which I soon found a challenging endeavour, both because of the growing complexity of some of the reading I was finding and due to the seemingly limited amount of historical analysis of feminist culture – particularly relating to black women. So my comparison began to look rather one sided, with many sources either referring to ‘feminists’ as one unified group or focusing blatantly on white feminist groups. So,  I expanded my topic outward. 

    I went back to my second year lecture reading list, as well as one which my supervisor, Dr Lee Sartain, had provided me with after my dissertation proposal, and spent the start of my third year familiarising myself with the wider movement and the most prominent pieces of analysis on the topic – scholars like bell hooks, Wini Breines and Margaret A. Simons to name a few. While doing this foundational research was where my supervisor was most helpful. When I was unsure or unaware of a particular book, organisation, or individual, my supervisor was extremely helpful in recommending reading and documentaries to familiarise myself with certain aspects of the second wave feminist movement. 

    Writing your dissertation can be an extremely daunting task. From the word count, the structural formalities, referencing, researching and even your acknowledgements, it can be extremely stressful and overwhelming. A helpful tactic for writing your dissertation is to follow your initiative when it comes to your research and to choose a topic which interests you, or at least one you think you would be able to write 10,000 words about. Either way by the end of your writing you might find yourself completely sick of your topic, I know I certainly did at times. 

    What I found most helpful in regulating my own stress and keeping my research and writing somewhat manageable was to break it all down as much as possible. I viewed the dissertation as three 2,500 word essays (each one a chapter) put together, one on the historiography surrounding my topic, and two based off of the most comparable aspects of black and white feminist cultures – literature and organisations. Then I broke each chapter down even further. The historiography chapter I divided into different debates/issues which existed in existing research on the second wave movement. Due to my dissertation being a comparison, I was able to divide my second and third chapters into two sections, one focusing on black feminists and the other on white feminists. Once I had broken down my workload into what seemed more manageable, I did my research in sections as well, focusing on one second of my dissertation at a time, allowing me to relax a little bit more. 

    I’m sure many of my fellow graduates will agree that your final year of study goes much quicker than you would expect! Between your dissertation, assessments, final year dinners, parties, and nights out, to your graduation, your final year is one to remember. Try to stop and smell the roses, look after yourself and your peers, and be proud of all that you have and will accomplish! 

     

  • London’s female gangsters: press responses and gendered implications 1890-1940

    London’s female gangsters: press responses and gendered implications 1890-1940

    On 17 May 2023 University of Portsmouth PhD researcher, Emily Burgess, presented her paper on the press’s treatment of female gangsters from the late-nineteenth to mid-twentieth centuries. If you missed the paper, the recording is available to watch here. You will need the following password T19#MUVU to access the recording. An abstract for Emily’s paper can be found below.

    Emily is a graduate of the University, having studied for a BA (Hons) History degree between 2017 and 2020 (awarded First Class honours) and an MRes in History between 2020 and 2021 (Distinction). She was awarded the ‘Robbie Gray Memorial Prize’ for the Best Undergraduate History Dissertation in 2020, and started her doctoral studies in October 2021. Her programme of research is titled: ‘The monstrous to monarchical underworld: A study of female gangsters and their impact on the public imagination 1890-1939’.

    Abstract
    Fitting directly into constructs of the ideological ‘underworld’ as well as challenging aspects of widely accepted ‘masculine’ and ‘feminine’ criminality, the female gangster was presented contemporarily as an androgynous construction; directly opposing class and gender conformity which was heavily embedded in society. This period, ranging from the late-Victorian to the start of the Second World War was one of contemporary challenges and changes, including transforming press reportage and the acceleration of the ‘public imagination.’ Satiated with stories of the ‘women leaders of London underworld gangs,’ female gangsterism became a phenomenon unique to late-nineteenth and early-twentieth century urban Britain. By examining female gangsters, their notable crimes, and their refraction within the ‘public imagination’ through reportage, this paper seeks to examine the gendered implications of gangsterism, and the way in which female gangsters were fixated upon by society.

     

  • Pompey: Champions of England: A research collaboration between the History team, students and Pompey History Society

    Pompey: Champions of England: A research collaboration between the History team, students and Pompey History Society

    In this blog, our Rob James, Senior Lecturer in History, discusses the local history project he worked on with one of our local community partners, Pompey History Society, that culminated in the publication of a book which includes a chapter written by Rob and four of our History students, Sam Ewart, Maria Kopanska, Dan Ward and Jack Woolley. Rob’s research explores society’s leisure activities and feeds into a number of optional and specialist modules that he teaches in the second and third year.

    ‘POMPEY Champions of England’ front cover

     

    On 26 October 2022, I attended the launch of the book POMPEY Champions of England: The sporting and social history of Portsmouth FC’s league title wins in 1949 & 1950, edited by the chair of Pompey History Society (PHS) Colin Farmery. The book launch, held at Portsmouth City Museum, was the culmination of the project ‘POMPEY: Champions of England’, run by PHS and generously funded by the Heritage Fund.

    I have been involved with the project from its inception. Many years ago now, Colin Farmery contacted me and asked if I was willing to be on the steering committee of a project that intended to capture, through undertaking oral history interviews, the memories of fans who witnessed Portsmouth Football Club’s back-to-back title wins in the 1948-49 and 1949-50 seasons. Of course, I jumped at the opportunity to be involved in the project. It allowed me to be more closely involved with the history of the football club I’d supported for many years, and also provided me with an opportunity to get the University, and more importantly, our students, involved and working with a local community organisation.

    Despite being disrupted by the Covid-19 pandemic, the project progressed well, and around 40 interviews were conducted and archived, leading to the production of a supplement of fan memories in the local newspaper The News, and the unveiling of a permanent exhibition at Fratton Park in late 2021.

    Pompey: Champions of England exhibition at Fratton Park

     

    The final aim of the project was to publish a book that placed the fans’ memories within the social and sporting context of the time they were visiting Fratton Park to watch Pompey achieve their incredible feat of consecutive title wins. The book was divided into the themes that had been drawn out from the testimonies of the supporters who were interviewed, and these included their memories of living in war-torn Portsmouth, the match-day experience, and the important role the football club played (and continues to play) in the local community. As editor, Colin Farmery had already commissioned a number of the chapters, but he approached me and asked if our students would like to be involved in writing a chapter on the theme of ‘Women and Football’. Of course, I said yes!

    First page of the chapter written by Rob, Sam, Maria, Dan and Jack

     

    Fortunately, one of our second year core modules, ‘Working with the Past’, is specifically designed to enable our students to work with the many local organisations who the History team are involved with. My colleagues and I work with the module’s coordinator, Mike Esbester, to offer students a suite of choices that allow them to gain valuable experience by working with these community partners.

    One of the choices I put forward was the opportunity to work with Pompey History Society, and we recruited four students, Sam Ewart, Maria Kopanska, Dan Ward and Jack Woolley, to work with the organisation. Colin invited the students to Fratton Park so that he could introduce them to the aims of the project. He also gave them a behind-the-scenes tour of the stadium, which included showing them the project’s permanent exhibition as well as a look at the Society’s archive. The task was set: the students were to be given access to all of the interviews that were conducted with female fans so that they could begin the research for their chapter.

    History students visiting the exhibition at Fratton Park

     

    For the project, four female fans – Joan Elder, Audrey Hawkins, Joan Phillips, and Maggie Thoyts – were interviewed. The students each took one of the testimonies, evaluated it, and wrote up a section for the chapter, which also coupled as part of their assessment for the module. I came back in at the end of the process and edited the students’ contributions so that the chapter ran along a thematic line, introducing additional contextual material to build a full picture of the women’s experience of being a female football fan in the 1940s and early 1950s.

    Lady Mayor Maria Costa speaking at the book launch

     

    So, there we have it, the book has been launched and the students are now published authors. That’s something to catch the eye of a prospective employer! Pompey History Society are thrilled with the work the students have done, and we are currently discussing what future projects our students could be involved with (I’m on the ‘125 Committee’ which is planning a series of activities to coincide with the 125th anniversary of the formation of Portsmouth Football Club in 1898). All in all, it’s been a great experience and I am so proud of our students’ achievements. Well done Dan, Jack, Maria, and Sam!

    Colin Farmery, Sam Ewart and Rob James at the book launch
  • Exploring the transgressive use of clothing by female groups from the 1920s to the 1970s

    Exploring the transgressive use of clothing by female groups from the 1920s to the 1970s

    Emily Jays graduated in Summer 2021 with a 2:1 in History and Sociology. Her dissertation was titled “Transgressing Gender Norms and National Identities Through Dress: Three 20th Century Case Studies”. This explored how clothing was used by flappers within 1920s America, butch lesbians and transgender women in post-1950 Britain and Muslim women and the veil in French Algeria and modern day France.  She is now studying a Master of Research in Humanities and Social Sciences at the University of Portsmouth, with an intersectional approach on the relationship between working-class women, higher education and their habitus. She is about to start the process of applying for PhDs, in which she hopes to do abroad.

    Last year, I presented my undergraduate dissertation research at the British Conference of Undergraduate Research (BCUR). My experience, from initial interest to the conference itself, was nothing other than positive. I had applied for another conference about which I had spoken with one of the History team at Portsmouth, Mike Esbester; because of this he informed me of the BCUR. I was somewhat sceptical due to it being a multi-disciplinary conference, however I thought I would have more regrets not applying than doing so and not being accepted. Before I submitted my application, I informed Mike and my personal tutor, Natalya Vince, that I wished to apply, and they were on hand straight away to help me with my abstract. A few back-and-forths via email of abstract drafts and my application was ready to go. This really helped me go into the process feeling confident and knowing that I had given my best work, and whatever the outcome would be I would be fine.

    Photograph of Colleen Moore in the film We Moderns
    Silent film actress Colleen Moore was considered the archetypal flapper in films like Flaming Youth (1923) and (above) We Moderns (1925).

    A few weeks later I found out that I had been accepted into the conference and would be presenting my ideas and research – I was over the moon about it! From there – Mike, Natalya and Julian Ingle (Deputy Head of the University’s Academic Skills Unit) helped massively in preparing my presentation and making it the best it could possibly be. There were a few practice runs with other students who were also in the conference watching, as well as times when tutors from the department came to watch and give their feedback. Of course, this was all done over Zoom which at first was a strange experience but you soon get used to it. Seeing the faces of my tutors pop up on the screen to come and watch my presentation was so comforting and their feedback was invaluable. The communication from Julian, who led us UoP students through the process, was second to none. We were aware of what was needed from us and what was happening at all times, as well as his vast experience to give us feedback.

    The conference itself was so enjoyable and it was great to see other subjects and perspectives from students all over the country. We had a group chat over the 2 days which was lovely, as we could all communicate and cheer each other on when we were due to present. The only negative thing I can say is that it would have been so much fun to have gone to Leeds for a few days and had the full experience. With that being said, the BCUR team’s organisation was fantastic and the whole thing run over Zoom was seamless.

    The cover of Rebel Women (1960) by Harry Whittington.
    The cover of Rebel Women (1960) by Harry Whittington.

    One of the most important things I have taken from the conference was that by presenting a part of my dissertation, it really allowed me to solidify my line of argument. By speaking my research aloud for others, who perhaps are not familiar with that part of history or the subject itself meant I had to ensure there was clarity in my presentation and argument. Although of course this took up extra time near the end of the year, the process helped significantly and my writing of my dissertation was better for it, as I achieved a first!

    Another way in which the process benefitted me significantly is my confidence in my own research and ability. To be chosen to present but also receive a positive response to my work from my tutors and those at the conference was a great feeling, particularly as my subject was relatively niche and others were intrigued. Being amongst other researchers was a great buzz and very inspiring, which has given me the boost to apply for a PhD in the near future after my MRes this year.

    If anyone was unsure about applying, I would tell them to just do it. Every part of the process was a learning experience and the whole time was extremely enjoyable. I have absolutely zero regrets. Thank you to the University of Portsmouth team and my tutors for their support and encouragement!

  • “Let’s start at the very beginning”: an attempt to explain the dissertation and provide reassurance

    “Let’s start at the very beginning”: an attempt to explain the dissertation and provide reassurance

    By James Farrar, final-year history student at the University of Portsmouth.  James’s supervisor Dr Fiona McCall writes:

    James was an exemplary dissertation student, always ahead of schedule in planning and carrying out his dissertation work, making him ideally placed to advise others on how to go about it.   

    James’s dissertation, ‘“This creature not deserving mother’s name”: Female Transgression and Cheap Literature in Sixteenth and Seventeenth Century Britain’ investigated how the different degrees of female transgression, everyday and extraordinary, were perceived and written about in cheap literature of sixteenth and seventeenth century Britain.  He found that everyday female transgression, like scolding, was often treated with humour and even gave women apparent agency, despite the reality of their subjection.  But, as James argues, literature and reality were not synonymous and the attitudes expressed in cheap print towards certain types of female transgression, like crossdressing, greatly differed between literature and reality. Serious female transgressions like murder and infanticide, although rare in real life, were latched onto by the media, demonising these women and characterising them as inhuman monsters. 

    This blog is about the dissertation. Hello? Still there? Good. You’re now already on the right track.

    Yes, the prospect of 10,000 words is daunting at first but remember these words encapsulate your research interests and give you the best chance to shine. The History team is fantastic at breaking-down each element of this assessment from conception to conclusion. You will never be left in the dark about how to complete it. Unless you have a power cut of course.

    “Let’s start at the very beginning” (thanks Julie Andrews). Don’t worry about choosing a firm topic too early. Before I started my degree, I thought I would write about Stalin as I was fascinated by totalitarianism from my time at school and college. What I hadn’t anticipated was studying a module about the underworld and deviant behaviour during my second year. The frankly thrilling nature of this module changed everything. The content covered eventually inspired the topic of my dissertation to be about transgressive women and cheap literature in early modern Britain. A bit different from comrade Stalin, right?

    She is bound but won't obey, ballad c. 1674-9, © Bodleian Library, 4o Rawl. 566(14)
    She is bound but won’t obey, ballad c. 1674-9, © Bodleian Library, 4o Rawl. 566(14)

    What this demonstrates is that you do not need to have a firm idea of what to do and rigidly stick to it. Changing your topic from an initial idea is not a bad thing; in fact, it can be a sign of progression and a realisation of what now stimulates you more as a degree student. Look at the content of the modules you have been studying and see if there are any particular areas that inspire you. This can be a good way to go. However, this is not the only path to choosing a topic. Some students write dissertations about parts of history barely covered in their modules. So, don’t think just because you haven’t learnt about something means you cannot write a dissertation about it. Therefore, talking to lecturers is vital.

    Lecturers know you and always have your interests at heart. My dissertation would not have been what it is without the constant support from the very beginning to the very end by my tutor and then supervisor, Fiona. No question or idea is stupid. Rome was not built in a day. Lecturers will help you develop a topic that stimulates your interests and that is also viable regarding the research you will need to carry out.

    Now that you have picked your topic, research is required. This will make you feel like a true historian. To quote our very own Thomas Rodgers, start with the “big books”. These are the works that provide the best concrete overviews of your topic. For instance, a ‘big book’ for my topic was Joy Wiltenburg’s Disorderly Women and Female Power in the Street Literature of Early Modern England and Germany. You see how this hit the nail on the head for my topic? You should be able to find these types of books from reading lists of the module(s) that are relevant to your dissertation. Your supervisor will be able to recommend them too, as Fiona did for me in this instance. Another idea is, to quote Thomas again, “follow the footnotes”. If you read a point in a book or article that you think is perfect, look to see where it came from and the chances are you have found another very relevant secondary reading. I would also suggest jotting down any reading that may be relevant even if you have some doubts. This way you create a sufficient reading list which you can prioritise as you see fit.

    From secondary reading comes the hunt for primary sources. Look at the primary sources from appropriate modules and recommended databases and archives from reading lists. Your supervisor will be able to guide you to the right places. It can take a while to find sources that fit the description of the Holy Grail but they are out there. Patience and perseverance are key here. I am naturally impatient but by logically going through, found the sources that resulted in my dissertation being what it is. Don’t be daunted by this process, it can just take time.

    Writing the dissertation is an adventure. Artefact 1 is what you will tackle first, outlining what you will argue, how the chapters will be structured, and highlighting key historiography. Planning well will see you through this. Chapter one discusses much of your historiography. I found it challenging to talk about everything, so this is about prioritising. Some historiography sets the scene whereas other parts support it. Chapters two and three involve the primary sources and place them in a framework of historiography. Initially, I got bogged down on chapter two as I wasn’t sure whether to structure the chapter source by source or thematically. Fortunately, Fiona was able to advise me the latter.

    Not all the points I concluded with were the ones I thought I would end with. It is good to remember the dissertation is a malleable entity. For instance, I found that certain primary sources did not feature the punishing of transgressive women. With Fiona’s encouragement and support this became a very important revelation for me as this only came to my attention from analysing and writing. The final product will not be exactly what you imagined but you will be glad of this.

    The whole process of the dissertation can be scary, especially writing it. However, you must remember that the entire degree up to this point has provided you with a solid foundation; the skills and knowledge to step into, what is for you, uncharted territory. However, all lecturers have come out the other side and possess the ability to guide you. The fact that you are now here proves you have got it in you.

    Now go out there and show the world what historians can do.

  • International Women’s Day 2021: Katherine Johnson: Mathematician at NASA

    International Women’s Day 2021: Katherine Johnson: Mathematician at NASA

    To celebrate International Women’s Day, we are delighted that UoP history graduate Ian Atkins has written this profile of pioneering NASA mathematician Katherine Johnson.

    For International Women’s Day I have chosen to write about Katherine Johnson, NASA mathematician, most famous for her work in calculation of the trajectory for manned space orbits, and subsequent lunar expeditions.[1] Johnson was born in White Sulphur Springs, West Virginia on the 26th August 1918. She was the youngest of four children, her mother a teacher and her father an all-purpose odd job man.[2] Katherine had always excelled at maths and was ahead of her class from an early age. Margot Lee Shetterly indicates that “Johnson was ahead of her contemporaries at every level, she enrolled at High School aged thirteen and was often if not all of the time top of her class”.[3]

    Katherine continued this diligent rise in education into her college years: she graduated from High school top of her class aged eighteen, after which she followed her mother into the teaching profession. When the quiet integration of race in the school system happened in West Virginia in 1939, Johnson along with two other black men were picked to attend the prestigious West Virginia University.[4] After just a year however, Johnson decided to leave and focus on starting a family, clearly still the focus of the woman in 1940s America. It is unclear if this was her choice or one that society dictated. Johnson returned to teaching when her daughters were older. In 1952 at a family gathering, a relative suggested that she applied for the open positions at the all-black West Area Computing Section at NASA forerunner: NACA.[5]

    There she excelled as a ‘Computer’, the term for a person who could calculate figures and stats long before the electronic versions.[6] Johnson made a steady rise in the WAC Section excelling in many aspects of her job. She was well known among her colleagues and was making inroads in mathematical research from the beginning of her career. Katherine suffered family tragedy in 1956 when her first husband, James Goble, died of an inoperable brain tumour. Three years later however, she met and married second husband Jim Johnson.  They were married for 60 years until his own death in 2019. During the Cold War period known as the Space Race the Soviet Union beat all competition when it launched the Sputnik satellite in 1957, thus changing the career path of Johnson and her colleagues. Robert A Devine has assessed that the “Eisenhower administration weren’t initially concerned by the launch, the gravitas of Russia coming first was a spur to get the job done for the US”. [7] When the NACA was amalgamated into NASA in 1958 Johnson naturally came along with the programme. She was by now providing expert mathematical data. Katherine was assertive in terms of her career: her oral testimony details that she worked as hard if not harder than her male colleagues, telling people that she had done the work (necessary data analysis and mathematical equations) required to be included in meetings and doctoral reviews.[8]

    As demonstrated in the 2016 Theodore Melfi biographical film Hidden Figures Katherine and her colleagues really came to the fore in 1962. The film delicately demonstrates the objectification of both race and sex in 1950s/60 America. As has been touched on, there was always a prejudice toward women and more so black women. The film aims in part to show a break down of the segregated barriers these exceptionally clever women faced. Using artistic licence, one of the film’s pivotal moments is when Johnson is confronted by her superior male colleague Al Harrison for taking many extended breaks. When she explains to him that as a black woman she must walk over half a mile to use the ‘coloured only’ bathroom he is appalled and thus breaks down the sign on the ‘whites only’ bathroom that is much closer to her work station. Later in the production, Katherine’s cementation in history is shown when she manually calculates the landing coordinates after a fault in the now more widely used mechanical computers. The film demonstrates the strong professional relationship that Johnson held with her male colleagues, although some are sceptical and some, including her immediate white female supervisor, are outright racist. The film depicts the success Johnson had and the fact that it was her work and tenacity that won through.[9]

     

    As Dorothy Vaughan’s biography shows, much of the segregation in the film had already been dismantled before the timeline in the production.[10] However, what the film does show is that even during the days of competing with a much greater adversary (the USSR) old prejudices still prevailed. The women that Hidden Figures depicts were good enough if not better for the roles that they held, and it is because of them that the Space Programme was able to be such a great success.[11]

    In conclusion, Katherine Johnson is truly one of the 20th Century’s ‘Hidden Figures’: a woman who defied the odds of both race and gender in the post war period of US history, a woman who was not breaking down barriers for the sake of it but was doing so because she was good enough to do it. Johnson was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by President Obama in 2015, aged 97. It is perhaps still the legacy of politics and racial tensions in the US that it took the outgoing first black President to award her the US’s Highest Civilian Honour. Johnson was a forthright and tenacious woman, a strong advocate of all creeds and colours and especially young girls and women getting involved in and excelling in the sciences. Katherine Johnson died aged 101 on 24th February 2020; at her death as one of her many obituaries, NASA administrator James Bridenstine described her as “an American hero and her pioneering legacy will never be forgotten”.[12] This being noted, Johnson was truly a pioneering woman, one that defied the odds and allowed for ground-breaking space work to be undertaken in an age where those around her believed anything was possible. A truly inspiring woman.

    [1] The National Aeronautics and Space Association (NASA). “NASA History: Katherine Johnson- The Girl Who Loved to Count.” https://www.nasa.gov/feature/katherine-johnson-the-girl-who-loved-to-count, last accessed 01 March 2021.

    [2] David Gutman, “West Virginian of the Year: Katherine G. Johnson,” Charleston Gazette-Mail, December 26, 2016, 10.

    [3] The National Aeronautics and Space Association (NASA). “NASA History: Katherine Johnson- Biography.” https://www.nasa.gov/content/katherine-johnson-biography, last accessed 01 March 2021.

    [4] Ibid.

    [5] Ibid

    [6] Oxford English Dictionary, “Computer,” (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).

    [7] Robert A. Devine, The Sputnik Challenge. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993), XIV.

    [8] National Visionary Leadership Project. “Katherine Johnson: Oral History Archive.” http://www.visionaryproject.org/johnsonkatherine/, last accessed 01 Mar 2021.

    [9] International Movie Database. “Hidden Figures, 2016 Film Dir. Theodore Melfi.” https://www.imdb.com/title/tt4846340/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1, last accessed 01 March 2021.

    [10] The National Aeronautics and Space Association (NASA). “NASA History: Dorothy Vaughan-Biography.” https://www.nasa.gov/content/dorothy-vaughan-biography, last accessed 01 March 2021.

    [11] Rotten Tomatoes: The Leading Online Aggregator of Film and TV Shows. “Hidden Figures.” https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/hidden_figures, last accessed 01 March 2021.

    [12] James Bridenstine, Via Twitter, “Katherine Johnson Obituary.”  Twitter, 24 February 2020.